Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_003_2_30_26_0010
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Dewey F. Bartlett Collection
- Title:
- Petition for Contracting Concho School and Agency Complex
- Date:
- 1974-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Native Americans
- Names:
- Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Kaw Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
- Topic:
- Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress, Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 93rd (1973-1975), 94th (1975-1977), 95th (1977-1979)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_003_2_31_22_0004
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Dewey F. Bartlett Collection
- Title:
- Inquiry Regarding Preferential Treatment for Indigenous Peoples in Employment Practices
- Date:
- 1976-05-07
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Kaw Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, Ponca Nation, Tonkawa Nation, Pawnee Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
- Topic:
- Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 94th (1975-1977)
![["A petition was submitted to the Business Committee on 7-22-78 by enrolled members of the Cheyenne-Arapaho Tribes of Oklahoma requesting a referendum election to be held on whether or not the tribe should contract Concho School and the physical facilities of the Concho Agency Complex. The action on this petition has not been taken yet."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Dewey%20F.%20Bartlett%20Collection/Subject,%201946-1978-CAC_CC_003_2_0000_0000_0000/CAC_CC_003_2_30_26_0001-Indian%20Affairs,%20Concho%20Indian%20School,%201974%20July%20-%201978%20Aug/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_003_2_30_26_0010_thumbnail.jpg "Petition for Contracting Concho School and Agency Complex")
![["Dr. Gary C. Young of Ponca City, Oklahoma raised questions regarding a job advertisement in the Ponca City News that appeared to give preferential treatment to Indians. The response from the Department of the Interior indicated that the advertisement was permissible under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which allows for preferential treatment for Indians living on or near reservations. The response also addressed concerns about federal funding and possible discriminatory practices by big corporations."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Dewey%20F.%20Bartlett%20Collection/Subject,%201946-1978-CAC_CC_003_2_0000_0000_0000/CAC_CC_003_2_31_22_0000-Indians%20Affairs,%20Elbert,%20Hazel/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_003_2_31_22_0004_thumbnail.jpg "Inquiry Regarding Preferential Treatment for Indigenous Peoples in Employment Practices")
