Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_003_8_61_29_0004
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Dewey F. Bartlett Collection
- Title:
- Law Enforcement Certification for Five Indian Tribes in Oklahoma
- Date:
- 1976-01-14
- Creator:
- Butler, Raymond
- Policy Area:
- Public Lands and Natural Resources, Native Americans
- Names:
- Kaw Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, Pawnee Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, Otoe Nation, Ponca Nation, Tonkawa Nation
- Topic:
- Indians of North America--United States
- Congress:
- 94th (1975-1977)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_003_2_31_22_0004
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Dewey F. Bartlett Collection
- Title:
- Inquiry Regarding Preferential Treatment for Indigenous Peoples in Employment Practices
- Date:
- 1976-05-07
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Kaw Indian Tribe of Oklahoma, Ponca Nation, Tonkawa Nation, Pawnee Indian Tribe of Oklahoma
- Topic:
- Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 94th (1975-1977)
![["A series of letters and communications regarding the certification of five Indian tribes in Oklahoma to perform law enforcement functions. There are concerns about the jurisdiction of the State of Oklahoma in Indian country, and a legal opinion is being sought. Senator Bartlett and other tribal representatives are involved in discussions to address these issues."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Dewey%20F.%20Bartlett%20Collection/Subject,%201946-1978-CAC_CC_003_2_0000_0000_0000/CAC_CC_003_8_61_29_0000-Tulsa%20Office%20Files,%20Indians,%20Bureau%20of%20Indian%20Affairs,%201974,%201976/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_003_8_61_29_0004_thumbnail.jpg "Law Enforcement Certification for Five Indian Tribes in Oklahoma")
![["Dr. Gary C. Young of Ponca City, Oklahoma raised questions regarding a job advertisement in the Ponca City News that appeared to give preferential treatment to Indians. The response from the Department of the Interior indicated that the advertisement was permissible under the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which allows for preferential treatment for Indians living on or near reservations. The response also addressed concerns about federal funding and possible discriminatory practices by big corporations."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Dewey%20F.%20Bartlett%20Collection/Subject,%201946-1978-CAC_CC_003_2_0000_0000_0000/CAC_CC_003_2_31_22_0000-Indians%20Affairs,%20Elbert,%20Hazel/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_003_2_31_22_0004_thumbnail.jpg "Inquiry Regarding Preferential Treatment for Indigenous Peoples in Employment Practices")