Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0019
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- "An In-Depth Analysis of H.R. 5647: Partition of Rights and Land Allocation between Hopi and Navajo Tribes"
- Date:
- 1967-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Hopi Tribe of Arizona, Navajo Tribe of Arizona, New Mexico & Utah
- Topic:
- Armed Forces, United States, Indians of North America--Oklahoma, Banks and banking--United States
- Congress:
- 92nd (1971-1973), 91st (1969-1971), 93rd (1973-1975), 90th (1967-1969)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0021
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- "An In-depth Analysis of H.R. 5647: Partitioning and Rights Allocation Between Hopi and Navajo Tribes"
- Date:
- 1967-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Hopi Tribe of Arizona, Navajo Tribe of Arizona, New Mexico & Utah
- Topic:
- United States, Armed Forces, Indians of North America--Oklahoma, Banks and banking--United States
- Congress:
- 90th (1967-1969), 91st (1969-1971), 93rd (1973-1975), 92nd (1971-1973)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0020
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- "Insight into the Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act: A Detailed Breakdown and Analysis of H.R. 7716"
- Date:
- 1967-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Hopi Tribe of Arizona, Navajo Tribe of Arizona, New Mexico & Utah
- Topic:
- Indians of North America--Oklahoma, Banks and banking--United States, United States, Armed Forces
- Congress:
- 91st (1969-1971), 92nd (1971-1973), 90th (1967-1969), 93rd (1973-1975)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0022
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- "An Examination of H.R. 7679: Resolving Land Disputes Between the Navajo and Hopi Indian Tribes"
- Date:
- 1967-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Navajo Tribe of Arizona, New Mexico & Utah, Hopi Tribe of Arizona
- Topic:
- Armed Forces, Indians of North America--Oklahoma, Banks and banking--United States, United States
- Congress:
- 90th (1967-1969), 91st (1969-1971), 92nd (1971-1973), 93rd (1973-1975)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0025
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- "Legislative Draft for the Navajo-Hopi Settlement and Economic Development Act of 1973"
- Date:
- 1967-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Hopi Tribe of Arizona, Navajo Tribe of Arizona, New Mexico & Utah
- Topic:
- Banks and banking--United States, United States, Indians of North America--Oklahoma, Armed Forces
- Congress:
- 92nd (1971-1973), 93rd (1973-1975), 90th (1967-1969), 91st (1969-1971)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0026
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- "Analysis of Land Rights and Interests in Healing v. Jones Case: Impact on Hopi and Navajo Tribes"
- Date:
- 1967-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Hopi Tribe of Arizona, Navajo Tribe of Arizona, New Mexico & Utah
- Topic:
- Armed Forces, United States, Banks and banking--United States, Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 93rd (1973-1975), 90th (1967-1969), 91st (1969-1971), 92nd (1971-1973)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0005
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- Dispute over XL Ranch Indian Reservation: Historical Injustices and Current Controversies
- Date:
- 1969-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Native Americans
- Names:
- Modoc Indians
- Topic:
- Armed Forces, Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 91st (1969-1971)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0007
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- Pit River Indians' Petition to Congress for Justice and Fair Treatment: A Plea for the XL Ranch Indian Reservation
- Date:
- 1969-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Names:
- Creek Nation
- Topic:
- Indians of North America--Oklahoma, Armed Forces
- Congress:
- 91st (1969-1971)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_3_0018
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- Participation of Off-Reservation Indians in Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service Programs: A Misconception Addressed
- Date:
- 1969-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Health, Native Americans
- Names:
- Delaware Tribe of Indians
- Topic:
- Armed Forces, Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 91st (1969-1971)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0001
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- John N. "Happy" Camp Collection
- Title:
- Letter to Congressman Regarding Pit River Indian Tribe Land Dispute
- Date:
- 1969-02-03
- Creator:
- Camp, John Newbold "Happy", 1908-1987
- Names:
- Modoc Indians
- Topic:
- Armed Forces, Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 91st (1969-1971)
![["H.R. 5647 authorizes the partition of surface rights in the Joint-Use Area of the Hopi and Navajo reservations, with specific allocations to each tribe. It also provides for allotments to certain Paiute Indians, directs the removal of Navajos from Hopi land and Hopis from Navajo land, and includes provisions for compensation, protection of existing allotments, and legal actions. The bill also authorizes appropriations to carry out its provisions."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Navaho-Hopi%20Dispute,%201972-1973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0019_thumbnail.jpg "\"An In-Depth Analysis of H.R. 5647: Partition of Rights and Land Allocation between Hopi and Navajo Tribes\"")
![["H.R. 5647 authorizes the partition of surface rights in the Joint-Use Area of the Hopi and Navajo reservations, with specific acreage allocated to each tribe. The bill also provides for allotments to certain Paiute Indians, directs the removal of Navajos from Hopi lands and vice versa, and includes provisions for compensation, protection of religious sites, and legal actions. An appropriation of $16,000,000 is authorized to implement the provisions of the Act."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Navaho-Hopi%20Dispute,%201972-1973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0021_thumbnail.jpg "\"An In-depth Analysis of H.R. 5647: Partitioning and Rights Allocation Between Hopi and Navajo Tribes\"")
![["H.R. 7716 is a bill known as the Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act that aims to authorize the separation of interests of the Hopi and Navajo Tribes in certain lands set aside by an Executive Order in 1882. The bill establishes a commission to determine the division of lands between the two tribes and provides for compensation to the Hopi Tribe. It also authorizes appropriations for a loan to the Navajo Tribe and for the Commission."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Navaho-Hopi%20Dispute,%201972-1973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0020_thumbnail.jpg "\"Insight into the Navajo-Hopi Settlement Act: A Detailed Breakdown and Analysis of H.R. 7716\"")
![["H.R. 7679 establishes a Navajo-Hopi Board of Arbitration to mediate and arbitrate the conflicting interests of the Navajo and Hopi Indian Tribes in lands within the Joint Use Area. The Board is tasked with facilitating negotiations between the tribes and reaching an agreement within 180 days. If an agreement is not reached, the Board will select the most fair and equitable offer for submission to Congress. The Act also includes provisions for land allotments, resettlement, and conservation efforts, with appropriations not to exceed $16,000,000."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Navaho-Hopi%20Dispute,%201972-1973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0022_thumbnail.jpg "\"An Examination of H.R. 7679: Resolving Land Disputes Between the Navajo and Hopi Indian Tribes\"")
![["The document discusses a bill that authorizes the separation of interests between the Hopi and Navajo tribes in certain lands set aside in 1882. It confirms exclusive rights for the Hopi tribe in certain lands within the Navajo Reservation. The bill aims to improve the conditions on both reservations and establish a commission for settlement and economic development. It also emphasizes the need for fair treatment of both tribes and the importance of long-term planning for the reservations' development."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Navaho-Hopi%20Dispute,%201972-1973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0025_thumbnail.jpg "\"Legislative Draft for the Navajo-Hopi Settlement and Economic Development Act of 1973\"")
![["The document discusses the rights and interests of the Hopi and Navajo tribes in the 1882 Executive Order Reservation. It states that the Hopi Tribe has exclusive interest in a certain part of the reservation, while both tribes have joint interests in other parts. The Act of July 22, 1958 conferred jurisdiction on a three-judge District Court to hear the case but did not mandate a complete division of the reservation. The Act also authorized the tribes to sell, buy, or exchange lands within their reservations."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Navaho-Hopi%20Dispute,%201972-1973/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_9a_0026_thumbnail.jpg "\"Analysis of Land Rights and Interests in Healing v. Jones Case: Impact on Hopi and Navajo Tribes\"")
![["The Pit River Indians historically occupied a large area of land in California, which was taken by the Federal Government without compensation. In 1938, funds were appropriated for the purchase of a reservation for the Pit River Indians, leading to the establishment of the XL Ranch Indian Reservation. However, there is a dispute over who should benefit from the reservation, with a small group known as the Pit River Home and Agricultural Cooperative Association monopolizing the land. This group has excluded other Pit River Indians from the reservation, leading to bitterness and resentment among the community. The Bureau of Indian Affairs has shown favoritism towards the Association, further exacerbating the dispute. There are also concerns about the lack of communication and resources provided to the broader Pit River Tribe. Overall, there is a complex and ongoing dispute over the ownership and management of the XL Ranch Indian Reservation."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Pit%20River%20Indians%20Correspondence,%20Injunction,%20Background,%201969-1970/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0005_thumbnail.jpg "Dispute over XL Ranch Indian Reservation: Historical Injustices and Current Controversies")
![["The Pit River Indians are petitioning Congress to deal justly with their claim to the XL Ranch Indian Reservation. They want Congress to add land to the reservation to be held in trust for the Pit River Indians in California, as designated by the Secretary of the Interior in accordance with the Indian Reorganization Act. They do not want any bill to designate beneficiaries without giving all concerned Indians a chance to be heard. The petition includes signatures from various members of the Pit River Tribe."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Pit%20River%20Indians%20Correspondence,%20Injunction,%20Background,%201969-1970/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0007_thumbnail.jpg "Pit River Indians' Petition to Congress for Justice and Fair Treatment: A Plea for the XL Ranch Indian Reservation")
![["The document discusses the misconception that the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Indian Health Service do not serve off-reservation Indians, emphasizing that they do provide services to off-reservation Indians and that they have a moral claim to such services. It also provides demographic background information on the population of Indians living on and off reservations in the United States."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_3_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Health,%201969-1971/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_3_0018_thumbnail.jpg "Participation of Off-Reservation Indians in Bureau of Indian Affairs and Indian Health Service Programs: A Misconception Addressed")
![["The letter is from California Indian Legal Services to Congressman John N. Happy Camp regarding a dispute over the XL Ranch Indian Reservation in Modoc County, California. The Department of the Interior has recommended amending a bill to designate a specific group as the sole beneficiary of the reservation, instead of following the original bill's intent to hold the land in trust for the Pit River Indian bands designated by the Secretary of the Interior. The letter urges the House Committee on Interior and Insular Affairs to reject the proposed amendment and follow the original bill as introduced by Congressman Johnson. The letter also mentions ongoing legal proceedings and requests a fair hearing for the Pit River Indians involved in the dispute."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/John%20N.%20Happy%20Camp%20Collection/CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0000-Committee%20on%20Interior%20and%20Insular%20Affairs%20Pit%20River%20Indians%20Correspondence,%20Injunction,%20Background,%201969-1970/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_009_2_67_12_0001_thumbnail.jpg "Letter to Congressman Regarding Pit River Indian Tribe Land Dispute")