<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<items xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:edm="http://www.europeana.eu/schemas/edm/">
  <item>
    <dcterms:provenance>Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK</dcterms:provenance>
    <dcterms:title>Concerns About Judicial Activism: The Case of Judge Sanders' Ruling</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:date>1999-01-01</dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:created>1999-01-01</dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:creator>unknown</dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language>eng</dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:temporal>106th (1999-2001)</dcterms:temporal>
    <dcterms:relation>Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection</dcterms:relation>
    <dcterms:isPartOf>CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000, Box 35, Folder 14, University of Oklahoma, Carl Albert Center Archives, Norman, OK, Standard Shelving</dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dcterms:source>https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/resources/1</dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:identifier>CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0077</dcterms:identifier>
    <edm:preview>https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0077_thumbnail.jpg</edm:preview>
    <edm:isShownAt>https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/archival_objects/873795</edm:isShownAt>
    <edm:isShownBy>https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0077.pdf</edm:isShownBy>
    <dc:type>correspondence</dc:type>
    <dcterms:subject>Science, Technology, Communications</dcterms:subject>
    <dc:subject>Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress; Older people</dc:subject>
    <dcterms:format>1 Page</dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:description>The document discusses the ruling by Judge Sanders banning the sale of do</dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:type>Text</dcterms:type>
  </item>
  <item>
    <dcterms:provenance>Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK</dcterms:provenance>
    <dcterms:title>Preserving the Rights of Private Property Owners: A Message from WARNES</dcterms:title>
    <dcterms:date>2000-01-01</dcterms:date>
    <dcterms:created>2000-01-01</dcterms:created>
    <dcterms:creator>unknown</dcterms:creator>
    <dcterms:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dcterms:rights>
    <dcterms:language>eng</dcterms:language>
    <dcterms:temporal>106th (1999-2001)</dcterms:temporal>
    <dcterms:relation>Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection</dcterms:relation>
    <dcterms:isPartOf>CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000, Box 35, Folder 14, University of Oklahoma, Carl Albert Center Archives, Norman, OK, Standard Shelving</dcterms:isPartOf>
    <dcterms:source>https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/resources/1</dcterms:source>
    <dcterms:identifier>CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0086</dcterms:identifier>
    <edm:preview>https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0086_thumbnail.jpg</edm:preview>
    <edm:isShownAt>https://arc.libraryhost.com/repositories/3/archival_objects/873802</edm:isShownAt>
    <edm:isShownBy>https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0086.pdf</edm:isShownBy>
    <dc:type>correspondence</dc:type>
    <dcterms:subject>Economics and Public Finance</dcterms:subject>
    <dc:subject>Older people; Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress</dc:subject>
    <dcterms:format>1 Page</dcterms:format>
    <dcterms:description>The author expresses their belief in protecting citizens' rights to private property and emphasizes the importance of limiting government infringement. They mention the principle of eminent domain but stress that it should be used sparingly and fairly compensated. Private property is seen as a foundational principle of the nation and free market capitalism that must be preserved and protected. The author thanks the reader for reaching out.</dcterms:description>
    <dcterms:type>Text</dcterms:type>
  </item>
</items>
