<oai_dc:dc xmlns:oai_dc="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc/ http://www.openarchives.org/OAI/2.0/oai_dc.xsd"><dc:title>The Debate Over Military Draft Extension: A Correspondence</dc:title><dc:date>1946-03-28</dc:date><dc:creator>unknown</dc:creator><dc:rights>http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NKC/1.0/</dc:rights><dc:language>eng</dc:language><dc:identifier>http://congressarchives.org/record/CAC_CC_047_1_6_46_0004</dc:identifier><dc:description>The document from Mr. Cavanaugh to Mr. Schwabe discusses arguments against the extension of the Selective Service Act and adoption of a universal peacetime Military Training Act. Mr. Cavanaugh questions the necessity of a large peacetime army and suggests that current news reports may be biased to support draft extension efforts. He also argues that ROTC is a better solution and questions the motives of the Army in advocating for draft extension.</dc:description></oai_dc:dc>