Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0006
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Defending the Constitution: Impeachment and Hate Crimes Legislation in 1998
- Date:
- 1997-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Economics and Public Finance, Civil Rights and Liberties, Minority Issues
- Topic:
- Courts--United States, Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress, Flood control
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0074
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Update on H.R. 1534: The Private Property Rights Implementation Act
- Date:
- 1998-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Topic:
- Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0020
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- The Impeachment of President Clinton: A Senator's Perspective
- Date:
- 1998-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Social Welfare, Labor and Employment
- Topic:
- Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress, Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0022
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Defending Democracy: Impeachment and Abortion in 1998
- Date:
- 1998-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Topic:
- Courts--United States, Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0075
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Clarifying the Role of and the Supreme Court in Second Amendment Cases
- Date:
- 1999-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Topic:
- Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 106th (1999-2001)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0079
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Response to Suggestions on Separation of Church and State in Supreme Court Jurisdiction
- Date:
- 1999-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Arts, Culture, Religion
- Topic:
- Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 106th (1999-2001)
![["The document discusses the impeachment of President Clinton and hate crimes legislation. The author voted in favor of impeaching Clinton, believing it was necessary to defend the Constitution and uphold the rule of law. They also express concerns about hate crimes legislation, believing that all violent crimes should be treated equally and swiftly punished. The author promises to keep the reader's views in mind if similar legislation is considered in the future."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Multiple%20Issues,%201997-1998/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0006_thumbnail.jpg "Defending the Constitution: Impeachment and Hate Crimes Legislation in 1998")
![["The document is a response to a letter regarding H.R. 1534, the Private Property Rights Implementation Act. The bill aimed to clarify laws regarding the taking of private property by government entities and ensure property owners could have their cases heard in federal court without delays. The bill was passed by the House of Representatives but was not voted on by the Senate. The sender, Dinh, assures the recipient that their views will be kept in mind for future legislation."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0074_thumbnail.jpg "Update on H.R. 1534: The Private Property Rights Implementation Act")
![["The document discusses the impeachment trial of President Clinton and the author's belief in the importance of impeaching him to defend the Constitution. The author also mentions plans for legislation on tax cuts, education funding, missile defense, and Social Security reform. The author encourages communication with constituents and expresses appreciation for differing opinions."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Multiple%20Issues,%201997-1998/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0020_thumbnail.jpg "The Impeachment of President Clinton: A Senator's Perspective")
![["The author expresses their support for the impeachment of President Clinton, stating that it was necessary to defend the Constitution and ensure that no one, regardless of power or popularity, is above the law. They also discuss their belief that life begins at conception and express their commitment to fighting for the rights of the unborn."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Multiple%20Issues,%201997-1998/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0022_thumbnail.jpg "Defending Democracy: Impeachment and Abortion in 1998")
![["The document explains that does not have the power to compel the Supreme Court to hear a case regarding the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court only hears cases with actual legal disputes between parties and does not provide advisory opinions. The Court can only consider cases involving the constitutionality of legal restrictions on the Second Amendment on an individual basis."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0075_thumbnail.jpg "Clarifying the Role of and the Supreme Court in Second Amendment Cases")
![["The recipient of the letter is thanked for sharing their thoughts on the separation of church and state and the Supreme Court. The sender explains that does not have the power to restrict the Supreme Court's jurisdiction, and decisions are made solely by the Court. The sender appreciates the input and offers further assistance if needed. The sender suggests seeking advice from a lawyer for a more detailed explanation on the topic."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0079_thumbnail.jpg "Response to Suggestions on Separation of Church and State in Supreme Court Jurisdiction")
