Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_003_2_30_14_0023
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Dewey F. Bartlett Collection
- Title:
- Congressional Activities: October 7, 1975
- Date:
- 1975-10-07
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Energy, Native Americans, Commerce
- Names:
- Miami Tribe of Oklahoma
- Topic:
- Older people--Medical care--United States, Political conventions--United States, Indians of North America--Oklahoma
- Congress:
- 94th (1975-1977)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0066
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Addressing Judicial Activism: A Call for Restraint and Accountability
- Date:
- 1997-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Commerce
- Topic:
- Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress, Democratic Party (U.S.), Political conventions--United States
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
![["The document provides a summary of the Senate's activities on October 7, 1975. It includes discussions and votes on various bills and nominations, such as Indian lands, natural gas, Federal Rules of Evidence, and nominations for U.S. Attorney and Federal Power Commission. Committee meetings and hearings on issues like the food stamp program and condominium regulations are also mentioned. The Senate is scheduled to continue discussions and votes on these matters in the coming days."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Dewey%20F.%20Bartlett%20Collection/Subject,%201946-1978-CAC_CC_003_2_0000_0000_0000/CAC_CC_003_2_30_14_0000-Indian%20Affairs,%20Cherokee,%201973%20Jan.%20-%201978%20Aug.,%201973-1978/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_003_2_30_14_0023_thumbnail.jpg "Congressional Activities: October 7, 1975")
![["The document discusses the issue of judicial activism, where federal judges interpret the Constitution broadly instead of following the letter of the law. The author expresses concern about judges legislating from the bench and the need for judicial restraint and strict interpretation of the Constitution. They criticize judicial appointees of the Clinton administration for being activist judges. The author calls for vigilance in screening judicial nominees to prevent activist judges from being appointed. They mention legislative efforts to address judicial activism and emphasize the importance of maintaining a balance of power between and the federal judiciary."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0066_thumbnail.jpg "Addressing Judicial Activism: A Call for Restraint and Accountability")