Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0006
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- George B. Schwabe Collection
- Title:
- Opinions on Measures: City Tulsa Ballot No. 136
- Date:
- 1945-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Topic:
- Business--United States, Commerce
- Congress:
- 79th (1945-1947)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0003
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- George B. Schwabe Collection
- Title:
- The Battle for Patents: A Call for Caution and Innovation
- Date:
- 1945-02-17
- Creator:
- unknown
- Topic:
- Commerce
- Congress:
- 79th (1945-1947)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_047_1_6_39_0024
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- George B. Schwabe Collection
- Title:
- A Call for Congressional Salary Increase
- Date:
- 1945-03-08
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Education
- Topic:
- Commerce
- Congress:
- 79th (1945-1947)
![["Various individuals express their opinions on different measures, such as government exporting American products for relief, government surplus goods for veterans, and subsidizing production of pre-fab houses. Some are in favor, some are against, and some choose not to vote on certain measures. The Federation is mentioned as not being subsidized."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0000-Small%20Business,%201946/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_047_1_6_59_0006_thumbnail.jpg "Opinions on Measures: City Tulsa Ballot No. 136")
![["The document discusses the issue of compulsory licensing of patents in the United States. The Anderson Company opposes compulsory licensing, arguing that it would stifle innovation and competition. The Murphy Elevator Company, on the other hand, supports compulsory licensing as a way to stimulate research and industry. The Anderson Company believes that their success and innovations would not have been possible under a compulsory licensing system. The debate highlights differing perspectives on the role of patents in incentivizing innovation."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0000-Patents,%201944-1945/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_047_1_6_4_0003_thumbnail.jpg "The Battle for Patents: A Call for Caution and Innovation")
![["The first letter is from George B. Schwabe, a Member of Congress, thanking M. Darwin Kirk for his understanding of the burden and expenses faced by Congressmen. Schwabe expresses his intention to visit Kirk during a recess and sends his regards to Kirk's family. The second letter is from Kirk, urging Schwabe to advocate for a substantial increase in the annual salaries of Congress members, suggesting $20,000 or at least $15,000 per year. Kirk promises to commend Schwabe if he votes for the increase."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/George%20B.%20Schwabe%20Collection%20/CAC_CC_047_1_0000_0000_0000-79th%20Congress,%201945-1947/CAC_CC_047_1_6_39_0000-Reorganization%20of%20Congress,%201945-1946/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_047_1_6_39_0024_thumbnail.jpg "A Call for Congressional Salary Increase")