Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0075
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Clarifying the Role of and the Supreme Court in Second Amendment Cases
- Date:
- 1999-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Topic:
- Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 106th (1999-2001)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0079
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Response to Suggestions on Separation of Church and State in Supreme Court Jurisdiction
- Date:
- 1999-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Arts, Culture, Religion
- Topic:
- Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 106th (1999-2001)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0087
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Opposition to H.R. 2372: Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2000
- Date:
- 2000-03-16
- Creator:
- Armey, Richard K., 1940-
- Topic:
- Courts--United States
- Congress:
- 106th (1999-2001)
![["The document explains that does not have the power to compel the Supreme Court to hear a case regarding the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court only hears cases with actual legal disputes between parties and does not provide advisory opinions. The Court can only consider cases involving the constitutionality of legal restrictions on the Second Amendment on an individual basis."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0075_thumbnail.jpg "Clarifying the Role of and the Supreme Court in Second Amendment Cases")
![["The recipient of the letter is thanked for sharing their thoughts on the separation of church and state and the Supreme Court. The sender explains that does not have the power to restrict the Supreme Court's jurisdiction, and decisions are made solely by the Court. The sender appreciates the input and offers further assistance if needed. The sender suggests seeking advice from a lawyer for a more detailed explanation on the topic."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0079_thumbnail.jpg "Response to Suggestions on Separation of Church and State in Supreme Court Jurisdiction")
![["The document is a response from man Dick Armey to a constituent regarding their opposition to H.R. 2372, the Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2000. The bill aims to lower legal barriers for landowners challenging local government actions under the Fifth Amendment's 'Takings Clause.' Armey explains the purpose of the bill, his support for it, and the progress it has made in . He thanks the constituent for contacting him and expresses his willingness to find common ground on other issues."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0087_thumbnail.jpg "Opposition to H.R. 2372: Private Property Rights Implementation Act of 2000")