Search
Search Results
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0066
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Addressing Judicial Activism: A Call for Restraint and Accountability
- Date:
- 1997-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Commerce
- Topic:
- Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress, Democratic Party (U.S.), Political conventions--United States
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
- Identifier:
- CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0023
- Contributing Institution:
- Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
- Collection:
- Richard K. "Dick" Armey Collection
- Title:
- Defending the Constitution and Fighting the Drug Epidemic: A 1998 Perspective
- Date:
- 1997-01-01
- Creator:
- unknown
- Policy Area:
- Economics and Public Finance
- Topic:
- Constituents' communication with members of the U.S. Congress, Democratic Party (U.S.), Flood control
- Congress:
- 105th (1997-1999)
![["The document discusses the issue of judicial activism, where federal judges interpret the Constitution broadly instead of following the letter of the law. The author expresses concern about judges legislating from the bench and the need for judicial restraint and strict interpretation of the Constitution. They criticize judicial appointees of the Clinton administration for being activist judges. The author calls for vigilance in screening judicial nominees to prevent activist judges from being appointed. They mention legislative efforts to address judicial activism and emphasize the importance of maintaining a balance of power between and the federal judiciary."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Judiciary,%201993-2001/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_36_14_0066_thumbnail.jpg "Addressing Judicial Activism: A Call for Restraint and Accountability")
![["The document discusses the impeachment of President Clinton and the drug problem in the country. The author explains why they voted in favor of impeachment, emphasizing the importance of upholding the rule of law. They also criticize the administration's handling of the war on drugs and discuss legislative efforts to combat drug abuse. The author emphasizes the need for a societal change in attitudes towards drug use and expresses commitment to addressing the issue at the federal level."]](https://jones-2.s3.amazonaws.com/Richard%20K.%20Dick%20Armey%20Collection/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0000-Correspondence,%20Multiple%20Issues,%201997-1998/Thumbnails/CAC_CC_002_6_38_14_0023_thumbnail.jpg "Defending the Constitution and Fighting the Drug Epidemic: A 1998 Perspective")